Facebook Social Networking Platform Ethical Dilemma Paper

Question Description

I’m studying for my Business Law class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

)Your paper should include, but is not limited to:

a) A factual summary of the ethical dilemma that the organization experienced;

b) the organization’s reaction to this dilemma;

c) how the organization’s reaction to the situation affected each of the major stakeholders in this situation. Include each stakeholder’s position in this case and their reaction;

d) your opinion as to whether the organization responded in the most ethical manner possible;

e) several alternative responses that the organization could have taken and the probable consequences of each;

f) describe how the relationship between the organization and its stakeholders changed after this incident, if at all; etc.

)You must cite your work but may choose any method that you wish.

Grading Rubric

• A factual summary of the ethical dilemma that the organization experienced; (15pts.)
• The organization’s reaction to this dilemma; (15pts.)
• How the organization’s reaction to the situation affected each of the major stakeholders in this situation. Include each stakeholder’s position in this case and their reaction; (20pts.)
• Your opinion as to whether the organization responded in the most ethical manner possible; (15pts.)
• Several alternative responses that the organization could have taken and the probable consequences of each; (20pts.)
• Describe how the relationship between the organization and its stakeholders changed after this incident, if at all; (15pts.)

• Description of all relevant facts in the case.
• Identification and explanation of the ethical dilemma.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Comprehensive explanation of the organization’s reaction to the dilemma.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Description of the effect of the organization’s reaction on each major stakeholder.
• All major stakeholders addressed.
• Each stakeholder’s position in the case.
• Each stakeholder’s reaction to the organization’s reaction.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Well justified opinion regarding whether the organization’s response was the most ethical or not, and why.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Identification and explanation of all reasonable alternative responses that the organization could have taken.
• Probable consequences (comprehensive) of each alternative response.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Explanation of the change in the relationship between the organization and the stakeholders due to the incident.
• Each stakeholder addressed.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent